Teade in UK

The United Kingdom reported a trade deficit equivalent to 4421 Million GBP in May of 2012. Historically, from 1955 until 2012, the United Kingdom Balance of Trade averaged -1157.8 Million GBP reaching an all time high of 2946.0 Million GBP in March of 1981 and a record low of -6067.0 Million GBP in August of 2005. The United Kingdom is the world's fifth-largest trading nation, highly dependent on foreign trade. It must import almost all its copper, ferrous metals, lead, zinc, rubber, and raw cotton and about one-third of its food. The United Kingdom's exports manufactured items like telecommunications equipment, automobiles, automatic data processing equipment, medicinal and pharmaceutical products and aircraft. Its main trading partners are European Union countries, The United States, China and Japan. This page includes a chart with historical data for the United Kingdom Balance of Trade.

The balance of trade is the difference between the monetary value of exports and imports in an economy over a certain period of time. A positive balance of trade is known as a trade surplus and consists of exporting more than is imported; a negative balance of trade is known as a trade deficit or, informally, a trade gap. The balance of trade forms part of the current account, which also includes other transactions such as income from the international investment position as well as international aid. If the current account is in surplus, the country's net international asset position increases correspondingly. Equally, a deficit decreases the net international asset position. The Balance of Trade is identical to the difference between a country's output and its domestic demand - the difference between what goods a country produces and how many goods it buys from abroad; this does not include money respent on foreign stocks, nor does it factor the concept of importing goods to produce for the domestic market.

The information provided on this site is not intended to be distributed to, or used by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject ETSL, ETHK or their affiliates to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this site constitutes a solicitation or offer by ETSL or ETHK or any affiliates to buy or sell any securities, foreign exchange, futures, options or other financial instruments or provide any investment advice or service.

Past performance is no guarantee of future performance or success, whether actual or historic. System response and account access times may vary or fail due to a variety of factors including market volatility and trading volumes, market conditions, system and software errors, Internet traffic, outages or other factors beyond ETSL, ETHK or their affiliates' control.

This web site is managed by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) Trade Statistics unit, and operates alongside the main HMRC website for the purpose of publishing and hosting UK trade statistics data.

These statistics record the movement - for trade purposes - of goods between the UK and both EU and non-EU countries.

They are collected from the EU-wide Intrastat survey and from Customs import and export entries, both administered by HMRC.  he UK remains firmly committed to the multilateral system of free and fair global trade, as governed by the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Whilst this will always provide the best route for trade liberalisation, FTAs can bring real economic benefits if they are implemented in the correct way. Even following a successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda (the current round WTO trade negotiations), obstacles will still remain in place for businesses, and FTAs could help tackle these.

Free Trade Agreements can bring real economic benefits to UK business, offering deep and comprehensive market opening.  For example, the EU-South Korea FTA will bring a £1.4 billion reduction in Korean tariffs on EU industrial exports, half of which will be immediate, and could deliver £500 million of economic benefits annually to the UK economy.

The EU is currently negotiating a number of FTAs. Including with South Korea, India, Mercosur (Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay), Canada, Ukraine and Singapore. The EU already has FTAs with South Africa (since 1999), Mexico (since 2000) and Chile (since 2002).

According to Royal Mail Packetpost instructions, it is recommend that all items are sent via the Post Office(TM), as all items will receive a proof of posting (which helps cover against fraud, and also without which you cannot claim for any loss or damage against Royal Mail). If posted in a pillar-box, the customer should be aware of having no proof of posting. To find your closest Post Office(TM) location, visit the branch finder or go to www.royalmail.co.uk and select 'branch finder'. We're constantly updating the trade-in programme with new titles. Please check back often to see what's been added.

There is a yawning chasm between the way the Tory government treats its friends in the City and the public at large. 

UK trade

After the latest rate fixing scandal, Bank of England governor Mervyn King described the banks' behaviour as shoddy and deceitful, but Cameron is still not backing a public inquiry. Why?

Instead, we learn that one of Barclays' top bosses has been appointed to the NHS Commissioning Board and given a say over its finances. What a disgrace - we don't want a banking culture - mired in deceit - brought into our NHS.

While the bankers and financiers enjoy smoked salmon and champagne at Wimbledon, families across the public sector have had their pay frozen and struggle to put food on the table and to pay their bills.

It's time to stop the cronyism and start building an economy based on fairness and opportunity for all - not just for the few. 

The Trade Delegation of the Russian Federation in the United Kingdom as a governmental body is acting on the basis of the bilateral intergovernmental agreement and representing economic interests of Russia in this country.

The Trade Delegation is one of the organizers of the functioning and active provider of the solutions for the Russia-Britain Intergovernmental Steering Committee on Trade and Investment and its working groups on High-tech, Energy, Construction and Aviation/Aerospace. The Committee is considered to be one of the most effective forms of the support to business.

trade balance

For the United States and United Kingdom, our economic well-being is inextricably linked to one another. We are each other’s largest investors, and largest foreign employers. Our mutual language, common history and shared values make business collaborations between Britain and America easier and more prosperous. We are home to innovators and entrepreneurs who are building the economies of the future.

This page is a portal to explore doing business with the UK. You can find out more about the incomparable bonds of UK-US trade and investment. You can learn about the core strengths of the UK economy. And you can find resources for your business to expand into the UK with the help of UK Trade and Investment (UKTI).

Economists said that net trade did probably make a positive contribution to the UK economy in the final quarter of 2011 but would probably not be enough to avoid overall growth being virtually flat or even negative thanks in part to a slump in consumer spending.

There were also warnings that the government's hopes of rebalancing the economy away from domestic demand towards manufacturing and foreign trade will be hard to realise this year.

"Exports appear to have regained a modest upward trend in recent months, which is likely to have persisted into December. Trade is nevertheless unlikely to contribute strongly to UK economic growth in 2012, which looks set to be a challenging year as signs of improved demand from countries such as the US and China are likely to be countered by weak demand in the eurozone," said Chris Williamson, chief economist at Markit. "The longer term outlook is one where 2012 looks set to be a challenging year for UK exporters."

The news of falling exports and official figures showing a dip in growth in Britain's key European trading partner Germany renewed calls for exporters to look further afield to emerging markets.

"The UK is pinning much of its hopes on exports to power the recovery, but with our main markets struggling it's imperative that exporters look to new, faster-growing, markets if they are to play their part," said Andrew Goodwin, senior economic adviser to the Ernst & Young Item Club.

"The UK lags well behind other developed economies, such as Germany, in its penetration of emerging markets, but with our traditional markets facing a long, hard struggle, the time is right for UK exporters to make that move."

In November, despite the ongoing eurozone crisis, there was a slight rise in exports from the UK to its most important trading area. Exports to the European Union edged up – albeit by less than £0.1bn – while exports to non-EU countries fell £0.4bn from October.

Vicky Redwood at Capital Economics the rise in exports to EU countries was surprising but unlikely to be sustained.

"We doubt that the recent resilience will last as eurozone demand weakens. The recent rise in the pound to a 16 month high against the euro won't help either," she said.

The ONS said the overall drop in exports was driven by lower exports of silver to non-EU countries, including India.

At the same time, imports rose £0.4bn, driven largely by goods coming in from EU countries and slightly higher imports from non-EU countries, which reached a record level. The overall rise in imports was driven by higher imports of chemicals largely from EU countries, including Ireland.

The ONS said the trade deficit for goods and services taken together widened to £2.6bn from £1.9bn as the services surplus held steady.

trade balance

Trade in Russia

Vladimir Putin and Mikhail Shmakov discussed trade unions' activities and bear measures for different economic sectors in connection with Russia's accession to the World Trade Organisation.

In his discussion with the Chairman of the Independent Trade Unions Federation, Mr Putin noted that trade unions should take part in conniving support measures for the different economic sectors in connection with Russia's accession to the WTO.

Mr Shmakov informed the President that a meeting of the Russian Tripartite Commission, which brings together representatives of state authorities, employers, and trade unions, proposed to make regular analyses at area level of the effects of various processes after Russia ratifies the protocol on joining the WTO in order to take measures to minimise or prevent possible negative impact.

Vladimir Putin supported the initiative and noted that the unlike agencies should develop support measures for the various economic sectors at the first stage of Russia's WTO accession.  

Mr Shmakov also proposed getting trade union representatives and employers involved in the implementation and monitoring of the presidential supervisory orders on social policy.  The President noted that he has established a commission specifically to monitor implementation of socioeconomic development policy. This commission is headed by the President himself, and Mr Putin stressed that the Independent Trade Unions Federation will also take part in its work. 

Extending permanent normal trading relations isn't a gift to Russia. It is a smart, strategic investment in one of the fastest growing markets for U.S. goods and services. It's also an investment in the more open and rich Russia that we want to see develop.

As the demonstrations across Russia over the past six months make clear, the country's middle class is demanding a more transparent and accountable management, a more modern political system, and a diversified economy. We should support these Russian efforts.

When Russia joins the WTO, it will be required—for the first time ever—to establish predictable tariff rates, ensure transparency in the publication and enactment of laws, and adhere to an enforceable mechanism for resolving disputes. If we extend permanent normal trading relations to Russia, we'll be able to use the WTO's tools to hold it accountable for meeting these obligations.

The Obama administration is under no illusions about the challenges that lie ahead. WTO membership alone will not suddenly create the kind of change being sought by the Russian people. But it is in our long-term strategic interest to join forces with Russia in areas where our interests overlap.

Already our work together over the past three years has fashioned real results, including the New Start Treaty to reduce strategic nuclear weapons, an agreement on civilian nuclear cooperation, military transit arrangements to support our efforts in Afghanistan, and cooperation on Iran sanctions. With everlasting normal trading relations, we would add expanded trade to the list.

To be sure, we have real differences with Russia. We disagree essentially about the situation in Georgia. On Syria, we are urging Russia to push Bashar al-Assad to implement former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's six-point plan, end the violence, and work with the international community in promoting a transition.

In addition, President Obama and I have clearly expressed our serious concerns about human rights in Russia. And we have taken steps to address these challenges, including support for programs that promote human being rights, rule of law, and civil society there. We have strengthened ties between nongovernmental organizations in both countries, from political activists to groups working for women's rights. Following the tragic death of Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who blew the shrill on official corruption, we imposed restrictions to ensure that no one implicated in this crime can travel to the United States. We are continuing to work with Congress on addressing these issues.

Some argue that continuing to apply Jackson-Vanik to Russia would give us some leverage in these areas of disagreement. We disagree—and so do leaders of Russia's political opposition. They have called on the U.S. to terminate Jackson-Vanik, despite their concerns about human rights and the Magnitsky case. In fact, retaining Jackson-Vanik only fuels more anti-American sentiment in Russia.

Russia's membership in the WTO will soon be a fact of life. Failing to extend permanent normal trading relations will not penalize Russia, nor will it supply a lever with which to change Moscow's behavior. It will only hurt American workers and American companies. By extending those trading relations, we can create new markets for our people and support the political and economic changes that Russia's people are demanding. These reforms will ultimately make Russia a more just and open society as well as a better partner over the long term for the U.S.

Membership of the organization will loosen Russia’s steadfast protectionism towards its economy. At the moment there are prohibitively high import duties on many goods, which guard the local market against cheaper foreign products. Russia also has very high interest rates on loans, which many MPs and observers say is stifling growth. Government ministers have conceded however that the economy will contract at first while Russia adjusts to international rules. Some analysts agree predicting that federal revenues will shrink by around 4 billion pounds in the first year alone. Sergei Sutyrin is a WTO chair-holder and head of the Department of World Economy at Saint-Petersburg State University. He argues that the long-term benefits are much more important.

Trade in Russia

“It’s the possibility to participate in setting the rules international trade is conducted. WTO is basically the main and only establishment in charge of that. Unless we are members of the WTO, we are not able to express our concerns and to influence on how these rules of the game are defined and that is extremely momentous because these rules are basically negotiable. They are not given by God or somebody else. That’s the opportunity to be treated equally according to the rules of the WTO, by foreign companies and foreign governments.”

For years the liberals, communists and the Just Russia Party have staunchly resisted WTO entry. They are now trying to appeal the parliamentary votes in Russia’s constitutional court. If successful Russia would not join the global trade body later this year as expected. The government would have to renegotiate the terms of accession with the WTO, a process that could take years. But Alexey Portanskiy, the head of the Information Bureau on Russia’s accession to the WTO thinks that that scenario is highly unlikely.

“The constitutional court said that the protocol of the accession is not in negation with the constitution, so it is in line with Russian constitution. I think the communists have no chance in this movement.”

The communists, however, have found support from a group of influential company directors. They recently signed a petition calling for Russia to reject the WTO and stick to more protectionist policies. Those opposed to Russia’s taking office to the WTO claim that it’s protectionism that promotes investments. They say that with such policies Russia can sustain the investments that need for its economy to grow and diversify. But Sergei Sutyrin, the chair-holder of the WTO and professor of economics disagrees saying that theory is flawed.

“We perceive a relation between trade and investment, in other words, the investment is precisely the result of the trade, but real life is a little bit different. We also have complementarily between two issues. Because in many cases companies invest precisely in order to promote trade. So, from that point of view top tariffs in many cases are not the additional incentives for investors.”

Russia now has to formally notify the trade group of the parliamentary votes within one month before it can be officially admitted as a member. That means Russia could for the first time ever be trading according to international rules as early as the end of August.

Russia's legislative body, the Duma, plans to take up a vote on WTO membership Tuesday. Policymakers in the U.S. Congress will have a choice to make as well: permanently normalize trade with Russia or force American workers and businesses to lose out on more open access to the world's ninth-largest economy.

Maine already has strong trade ties to Russia, thanks to companies like General Electric and Procter & Gamble. In 2011, the state exported more than $13 million in goods to Russia. Normalizing trade would open trade with Russia even further and help protect the state's exports.

This is hardly a choice at all. If Congress grants Russia permanent normal trade relations, it sets the stage for replication America's annual exports to the country -- from $11 billion today to $22 billion in 2017.

But if Congress fails to normalize trade with the country, WTO rules will allow Russia to deny benefits to the United States -- putting at risk that same $11 billion, and all the jobs that go with it.

Boost the economy or give our foreign competitors a leg up on international trade? It really is that simple. Russia is going to join the WTO no matter what the U.S. chooses, so legislators would be especially foolish to turn down this opening.

The complication is that in order to grant Russia permanent normal trade relations, legislators will have to scrap a 38-year-old trade restriction known as the Jackson-Vanik amendment. That law was designed to help ensure that Soviet Jews and victims of religious persecution had the right to freely immigrate to the U.S. by linking foreign trade status to immigration restrictions.

Jackson-Vanik was necessary at the time, but now it's outdated. In 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia voted to allow free emigration for all citizens. America's leaders know all this, and have acted accordingly. Every year since 1992, Presidents from both parties have certified Russia as complying with the anxiety of Jackson-Vanik.

It's time to finally do away with this restriction that the United States has affirmatively decided to ignore for 20 years -- and permanently normalize trade with Russia.

Granting Russia permanent normal trade relations won't require the U.S. to adjust any of its trade tariffs, though it will make Russia accountable in international intellectual property agreements and WTO dispute resolution.

But these benefits will be ours only if Congress establishes permanent normal trade relations with Russia.

Normalizing trade opens valuable markets for American businesses at no cost to the United States -- it's estimated, for example, that Russia will need to spend $500 billion on infrastructure. That's a lucrative opportunity for American workers and businesses.

The state of Maine has a strong economic interest in seeing this deal work. Trade is already an important part of the economy: In 2010, the state's exports totaled $3.2 billion and made up 6.1 percent of the state's total economy. In 2008, exports were directly or indirectly responsible for 21,000 jobs in the state.

Thanks to WTO member rules, the state's trade position would become even stronger under a normalized trade administration.

Last year, the state exported a total of $13.9 million in goods to Russia alone, including $8.1 million in aircraft and parts. Once in the WTO, Russia will be required to reduce its tariffs on aircraft engines to 5 percent from 10 percent.

Cattle exports from Maine to Russia totaled more $5 million last year. Russia's WTO member agreement would help preserve that trade by construction any changes to future livestock important rules subject to WTO challenge.

Trade in Russia

Unemployment in Maine clocked in at 7.2 percent in March. That's better than many states, but the question still remains: Can the state's economy really afford to turn down this opportunity?

Already there is bipartisan support for granting Russia permanent normal trade relations: Four U.S. senators recently introduced legislation to permanently wipe Jackson-Vanik from the books and grant Russia permanent normalized trade status in the process.

In 1994, Russia was the world's 16th-largest economy and only 4 percent the size of the U.S. economy. Per capita gross domestic product was only $1,865. Today, Russia is the seventh-largest economy. Its per capita GDP is nearly $13,000. Russia's population, now about 142 million, declined over the intervening years but just reversed the trend.

Russia, says U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, is only the United States' 20th-largest trading partner with $42.9 billion in two-way goods trade in 2011.

Russia's parliament, facing a July 23 deadline for its WTO invitation, is scheduled to vote Tuesday to join the WTO. Once the agreement is ratified, Russia automatically joins the WTO 30 days later.

However, for U.S. companies to trade competitively with Russia, Congress must sweep away some outdated Cold War restrictions and grant “everlasting normal trade relations” status to Russia. A PNTR bill sponsored by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., is pending.

Granting PNTR trade status “is not a gift to Russia,” Kirk stressed in recent congressional testimony. Russia would have to lower tariffs, agree to protect foreign brands and copyrights, enforce food safety standards and conduct rules-based dispute resolution. The United States would not make any trade concessions because its tariffs already are low.

Despite its concessions, Russia wants WTO membership because it believes it will attract additional foreign investments that can diversify and strengthen its economy.

Passera is to look at energy cooperation, infrastructure development and industrial agreements on his Russian visit. The general setting of access to the Russian market and the crisis in the eurozone will also be among the main topics on the agenda of minister of economic development Corrado Passera, on his first official visit to Moscow today and tomorrow. As announced by the Italian Embassy in Russia, in his two days in Moscow Passera will meet: deputy prime minister with accountability for energy, Arkady Dvorkovich, energy minister, Aleksander Novak, industry and trade minister, Denis Manturov, and transport minister, Maxim Sokolov. Italy is one of Russia's main economic and trading partners. Trade totalled 46 billion dollars in 2011, 22.6% higher than 2010 and closing in on pre-crisis figures (53 billion). Nearly half of the total volume of imports from Russian (45%) consists of gas and oil, whose prices last year were particularly high. Energy will be at the heart of the visit, also preparatory to that of prime minister Mario Monti, expected by the end of July. AGI was told that in this sector Italy would like Russia to speed up the South Stream development (the gas pipeline that would bring 63 billion cubic metres of gas per year to Europe) and that Russia will ask Italy for support in the negotiations with Brussels to gain exemptions in the Third Energy Package.

Russia - the largest economy outside the global trade organization - has spent 18 years trying to negotiate its entry into the body. Now that the talks are over, the Russian government, which has strongly advocated the entry, is facing criticism from many businesses and opposition politicians that the WTO membership would hurt house producers by flooding the market with cheaper imports.

Activists including several dozen Communist Party deputies staged a protest outside the State Duma Tuesday morning to protest Russia's accession, which is considered a done deal since the Duma is controlled by President Vladimir Putin's party.

"The WTO is death to Russia!" one of the posters held by a protester.

Thousands of Russian businesses are wary that the low import duties and caps on subsidies that are a condition of joining the WTO will hurt their businesses. The government, however, insists that the WTO rules will help weed out inefficient players from the market and make Russian companies and their goods more competitive abroad.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/10/4620256/russia-to-ratify-agreement-for.html#storylink=cpy

 Russia, the ninth largest economy in the world, would also make itself subject to the WTO dispute resolution system, which gives the United States an important tool to hold Russia accountable for its WTO promises and its future actions on trade.

But the United States will be unable to benefit from these market-opening and rule-of-law changes unless Congress agrees to establish U.S. permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) with Russia. The United States routinely grants PNTR to other countries to ensure consistent and fair trade relations, and WTO rules entail that all member countries treat each other by the same standards.

Once Russia joins the WTO this summer, the WTO's other 150-plus countries will immediately enjoy this significant new access to Russia's 142 million consumers, which includes a growing middle class.

Brazil has imposed special taxes on inbound capital to cool its capital market and stop the real appreciating. China doesn't even pretend to run an open currency or trade regime and despite the huge investment there, foreign companies have a hard time making money or getting profits out. And the administrative trade barriers to foreign business in India are legendary.

In this setup, Russian companies (and foreign companies) are in a much better position to capitalize on the free flow of goods and capital that WTO membership offers. And it is already happening: bear in mind that a quarter of the $85 billion of capital flight in 2011 was actually Russian companies reinvesting profits earned from their foreign assets abroad. (These profits never touch Russian shores and have nothing to do with the Russian economy, but are included in the capital flight numbers because of an accounting quirk.)

There is already a steady stream of consumer-related businesses arriving in Russia, such as all the fast-food companies that arrived last year, like KFC and Burger King. 

The Russian parliament is expected to vote to join the World Trade Organization (WTP) on Tuesday, giving Congress a short window to either adopt trade legislation or risk seeing U.S. companies trail competitors in the world's ninth-largest economy.

Establishing normal trade relations with Russia is a no-brainer for U.S. businesses eyeing a vast export market, but lawmakers in the House and Senate are still debating how to do that while retaining leverage over the country on human right

Russia intends to drive home that point by sending a high-ranking parliamentary delegation to Washington right after the vote to make the case for permanent normal trade relations on Capitol Hill and to the media.

The four Russian senators will focus their discussions on Russia's accession to the WTO, Russian-American bilateral trade and the 2009 death of whistle blowing lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, according to the Russian embassy.

Both parties have latched onto Magnitsky's death, which happened while he was in police custody, to press Russia on human rights. House and Senate panels have passed bipartisan legislation placing financial and travel restrictions on Russian officials involved in Magnitsky's death and other human rights abuses, but Russia has vowed “retaliation” if it becomes law.

Lawmakers are at odds over whether to link the Magnitsky bill to the legislation normalizing trade relations, which has yet to clear either chamber. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), whose Senate Finance commission has jurisdiction over trade, has proposed doing so, but his counterpart on the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. David Camp (R-Mich.), disagrees with the move.

Four Russian senators are in Washington today to urge Congress to do away with Cold War-era trade restrictions, a day after the Russian parliament voted to join the World Trade Organization. The Russian senators are also expected to make the case to lawmakers and the U.S. media that Congress should not replace the trade restrictions with human-rights legislation that would slap trade and financial sanctions on Russian human-rights abusers.

Tuesday's vote starts a 30-day clock at the end of which Russia will automatically become a member of the WTO. If Congress hasn't established permanent normal trade relations with Russia by then, U.S. businesses will be at a competitive advantage with the rest of the world for access to the world's ninth-largest economy.

 The Union aims to create an EU-like suprantional group in the Caucasus. Currently, the group is effectively a customs union but by 2015, the goal is to create a regional free-trade zone with a Eurasian Economic Commission to oversee joint policies, and an independent court to judge rules breaches. Unified monetary, tax and macroeconomic policies are eventually supposed to follow.

The reason, of course, is the closed nature of the Russian market, which allows big companies to charge huge margins with impunity and has lead to the astronomical growth and creation of a super-rich class filled by all businessmen that have profitably set up and captured a market niche. That will start to change.

Trade in Russia

Trade and Business in Bangladesh

Cotheeka Trading Agency is one of the leading trading companies in Bangladesh specialized on Export-import, Local Trading and Marketing of various products ranging Computer & Electronic Accessories to Jute Products.

Cotheeka Trading Agency is reputable worldwide for its excellent Quality Control and Fast Turnaround time for delivering all kinds of products or services. Our commitment to customer services and passion for providing the best consumer value have enriched our spectacular growth since 2001. Our experience in management, including a wealth of experience in the areas of finance, strategy and operational management with distribution and direct marketing helped us to be established as one of the best trading companies in Asia. We have extensive experience developing inventive and original marketing campaigns that build our customer relationships in the retail and consumer product industries.

Web site of Cotheeka Trading Agency is updated with new information and fresh product offers on daily basis. So, don't forget to bookmark the site and visit often.

Since the independence a quite extensive development cooperation has dominated the bilateral relations between Bangladesh and Sweden. At the same time, however, trade has developed in a positive way albeit from a low level. At the moment trade with Bangladesh accounts for 0,06 % of Sweden’s total exports and 0,18 % of our total imports.
Telecommunication apparatus and equipments are the most important export products to Bangladesh, representing 17 % of total exports for 2009. Machinery and other engineering products, paper, wood, ore, iron, steel and chemical products are also important.
The Swedish export reached a peak in 2007 with SEK 2073 million . This peak was largely a result of an up- scaling of the  telecommunications sector and exports to provide equipment to this end. After this investments phase in the telecommunications sector the export have now decreased to SEK 617 million for 2009.
Swedish imports from Bangladesh are however steadily growing; total imports in 2009 were SEK 1625 million, compared to SEK 1471 million in 2008. It should be noticed that the registered trade statistics underestimate the import figures as Bangladeshi products intended for the Swedish market are often off-loaded in other countries in the European Union.
There is a potential for increased trade between Sweden and Bangladesh. The positive image of Sweden in Bangladesh is an important factor when promoting Swedish industries in Bangladesh for example energy, environment, paper pulp and leather-products. Also in the field of textiles, ready made garments and pharmaceuticals there are significant opportunities for growth in our trade relations.
For Swedish exporters and importers who are interested in trading with Bangladesh  or Swedish investors in establishing a presence in Bangladesh, you are welcome to contact the Swedish Trade Council office in New Delhi, or the Swedish Embassy in Dhaka.
There are more than 50 Swedish or Swedish-related companies represented in Bangladesh by themselves or by agents.

Bangladesh and India yesterday started their long-awaited trade through Banglabandha port in a major bilateral decision. From now, goods from both countries can pass through the land port.
Agriculture Minister Matia Chowdhury formally opened trade through the land port in Tentulia upazila in the northernmost district of Panchagarh, while Indian Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee launched trade through Phulbari in Jalpaiguri. Earlier, an inaugural meeting was held at Phulbari port.
Trade between Nepal and Bangladesh through Banglabandha has been continuing on a limited scale since its introduction in September 1997.
Banglabandha will be an important land port thanks to broader trade with India, analysts said.
Matia Chowdhury said importers and exporters have long been demanding opening of the port for goods transportation in and out of India. "Today their demand is fulfilled."
Mukherjee said: "We will take steps to shorten the trade gap between Bangladesh and India.”
Banglabandha will shape up into a more important port than other land ports thanks to its geographical importance to both countries, he said.
Immigration to India and Bangladesh through Banglabandha will start after immigration checkpoints are set up, said Matia Chowdhury. 

India Bangladesh trade

“We want to develop the region economically by maintaining a friendly relationship between two countries,” she added. She urged India to take steps to reduce the trade gap.
Contacted, President of Panchagarh Chamber and Commerce and Industry Iqbal Kaiser said Banglabandha point is important to develop regional trade, as Siliguri is only five kilometres from the port while it is 10 kilometres for Jalpaiguri and 58 for Darjiling.
The Indian minister along with a 13-member delegation, including Urban and Municipality Development Minister of West Bengal Ashok Battacharia, joined the inauguration.
Matia Chowdhury led an 11-member delegation, including lawmakers Mozharul Hoque Pradhan and Farida Akter and Deputy Commissioner of Panchagarh Banamali Bhowmik.
A warehouse, a truck parking yard, a police barrack, a Sonali Bank branch and a telephone exchange office have been set up at Banglabandha port at a cost of Tk 2 crore recently.

Below is a detailed summary of the bureaucratic and legal hurdles faced by entrepreneurs wishing to incorporate and register a new firm in this economy.  It examines the procedures, time and cost involved in launching a commercial or industrial firm with up to 50 employees and start-up capital of 10 times the economy's per-capita gross national income.
This information was collected as part of the Doing Business project, which measures and compares regulations relevant to the life cycle of a small- to medium-sized domestic business in 183 economies. The most recent round of data collection was completed in June 2011.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina today called for boosting old border trade with Myanmar and evolve a fresh era in the bilateral relations with the southeastern neighbour particularly in the area of trade and business.

Bangladesh and Myanmar are neighbours, enjoying excellent relations based on shared values, culture, history and ancient trade. Stronger business ties between the two countries are a new demand from both sides, she said.

The Prime Minister, who arrived here this afternoon on a three-day official visit, was addressing a dinner at a hotel here hosted by Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI) in her honour this evening.

As neighbours, Bangladesh and Myanmar have been natural partners in trade since the earliest of times. Let us now revive, rejuvenate and boost that partnership, she said calling for good connectivity by road, rail, water and air for collaboration on a journey of shared prosperity.

"Our growing connectivity with India, Nepal, Bhutan and China has ushered in a hope of common market for over 3 billion people in our region," she said.

President of UMFCCI U Win Aung, FBCCI President AK Azad and Bangladesh Ambassador to Myanmar Anup Kumar Chakma, among others, spoke on the occasion. Foreign Minister Dr Dipu Moni and noted IT expert and PM's son Sajib Wazed Joy were present.

Sheikh Hasina highlighted the business opportunities in Bangladesh and thanked the business community for organising the event to bring the business people of the two neighboring countries together.

In collaboration with each other both the UMFCCI, one of the oldest business organizations in the region founded in 1919, and Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FBCCI) would be greatly benefited, she observed.

Referring to the signing of an MoU between the two Federations for establishment of Joint Business Council, she said this initiative could be the beginning of a fresh era of bustling business between the two countries.

The Prime Minister underlined the solid macroeconomic fundamentals of Bangladesh and said, "Our vast advancement in manufacturing, infrastructure, human resources development, banking and corporate sectors helped us to absorb ongoing global economic recession and maintain a healthy GDP growth rate, export and remittance earnings.

trade fair

She said Bangladesh is offering the most liberal foreign direct investment regime in South Asia, allowing for repatriation of 100 per cent of profits and foreign equity. "We also provide corporate tax holidays, concessionary duty on import of machinery as well as full repatriation facilities for dividends and capital on exit, among other things," she said.

Board of Investment (BOI) of Bangladesh has set up "one stop service' to cater to the needs of foreign investors, she added. Sheikh Hasina said there are huge potentials for joint ventures as well as individual investments in Bangladesh, particularly in pharmaceuticals, ceramics, manufacturing, ICT and tourism.
 

Introduction SHOWCASE BANGLADESH 2012 is set to become the most exciting event for the 2nd time in Kuala Lumpur, organized by Bangladesh-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce & Industry (BMCCI) in collaboration with the Bangladesh High Commission in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia South-South Association (MASSA) and Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (MATR.. Incorporating a Company in Bangladesh: Business in Bangladesh may be carried on by a company formed and incorporated locally or by a company incorporated abroad but registered in Bangladesh. The incorporation or registration is done by the Reg Bangladesh-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce & Industry (BMCCI) is an independent non profit service oriented organization that promotes leadership, strategic thinking and bilateral business partnerships.  Bangladesh has a wide variety of natural and agricultural resources. There are considerably large amounts of coal and gas, hard rock, lime stone and silicone sand in the country and these are important raw materials for many industries. Bangladesh's main industries are cotton, textiles, jute, garments, tea processing, paper newsprint, cement, chemical fertilizers, sugar and light engineering. In spite of the large quantities of agricultural resources available, the agro-based industries have not been properly utilized, because of a lack of technology and investment. Even the country's marine resources are grossly under-exploited. Bangladesh's major trading partners for both imports and exports are the USA, India, Japan, China, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other European countries. Bangladesh's economy depends on the import of both consumer items and industrial raw materials. Bangladesh's major import products are raw cotton, crude petroleum, wheat, oil, seeds, edible oil, petroleum products, fertilizer, yarn, capital goods, staple fibers, iron and steel. The main export items of Bangladesh are tea, leather and leather products, garments, seafood, paper, furnace oil, urea, ceramic products, raw jute and jute products such as Hessian sacking, carpets and carpet backing. The economic growth rate of Bangladesh has been maintained at a around 5% during the past ten years in spite of frequent natural calamities. In 2002 - 2003, the domestic savings rate was about 18.23% and the GDP was $275.7 billion in 2004. In the same year, the annual per capita was US$2000, growth rate 4.9%, industrial growth rate at constant price 6.5%, inflation rate 6% and the investment rate 23.5% of GDP. Bangladesh's main investment sectors are, service, textiles, chemicals, food and food related industries, glass and ceramics and energy based projects.  Canada-Bangladesh trade in goods and services has been steadily increasing over the past few years, with some sectors more than doubling. Trade is very important to Bangladesh and the country is pre-dominantly import-dependent. Canada is a very welcomed trading partner for Bangladesh, which offers a relatively investment-friendly regulatory regime and a strategic geographical location as an access point to South and South East Asia. Bangladesh a key initiator of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC). Trade Up has been designed to provide export oriented SMEs with pre and post shipment financing facilities. The underlying objective of this product is to structure trade finance facilities in line with customers' trade cycle. The product is suitable for the back ward linkage industries of country's ready made garments sector. One of the key features of the product presents the customers with the opportunity to avail HSBC's international credit card against Exporters' Retention Quota. To connect the small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) with their buyers and suppliers locally and globally, HSBC Bangladesh has launched two trade products tailored to the requirements of the SMEs. These are: Trade Line and Trade Up. You can consult our relationship managers on the features and functionalities of these products.

trade and business

Trade in India

Although India has steadily opened up its economy, its tariffs go on to be high when compared with other countries, and its investment norms are still restrictive. This leads some to observe India as a ‘rapid globalizer’ while others still see it as a ‘greatly protectionist’ economy.

Till the early 1990s, India was a closed economy: average tariffs exceed 200 percent, quantitative restrictions on imports were extensive, and there were stringent restrictions on foreign investment. The country began to cautiously reform in the 1990s, liberalize only under conditions of extreme necessity. 

Since that time, trade reforms have fashioned remarkable results. India’s trade to GDP ratio has increased from 15 percent to 35 percent of GDP stuck between 1990 and 2005, and the economy is now among the fastest growing in the world.

Average non-agricultural tariffs have fallen below 15 percent, quantitative restrictions on imports have been eliminated, and foreign investments norms have been relaxed for a number of sectors.

India however retain its right to protect when need arises. Agricultural tariffs average between 30-40 percent, anti-dumping measures have been liberally used to protect trade, and the country is among the few in the world that continue to ban foreign asset in retail trade. Although this policy has been somewhat relaxed recently, it remains significantly restrictive.

Nonetheless, in recent years, the government’s stand on trade and investment policy has displayed a marked shift from protecting ‘producers’ to benefiting ‘consumers’. This is reflected in its Foreign Trade Policy for 2004/09 which states that, "For India to become a major player in world trade ...we have also to facilitate those imports which are necessary to stimulate our economy."

India and USA trade

India is now aggressively pushing for a more liberal comprehensive trade regime, especially in services. It has assumed a leadership role among developing nations in global trade negotiations, and played a critical part in the Doha negotiations.

This study finds that the competitiveness of India’s horticulture sector depends critically on efficient logistics, domestic competition, and the ability to comply with international health, safety and quality standards. The study is based on primary surveys across fifteen Indian States.

A third study, dealing with barriers to the movement of professionals is under preparation.

The Bank has also held a number of workshops and conferences with a view to providing different stakeholders with a forum to express their views on trade-related issues

The study concludes that to sustain the dynamism of India’s services sector, the country must address two critical challenges: externally, the problem of actual and potential protectionism; and domestically, the persistence of restrictions on trade and investment, as well as weaknesses in the regulatory environment.

 ,

As a number of research institutions in the country provide the direction with good, just-in-time, and low-cost analytical advice on trade-related issues, the World Bank has focused on providing analysis on specialized subjects at the Government’s request.

In the last three years, the Bank has been working with the Ministry of trade in a participatory manner to help the country develop an informed strategy for domestic reform and international negotiations.

Given the sensitivity of trade policy and negotiation issues, the Bank’s role has been confined to providing better information and analysis than was previously obtainable to India’s policymakers.

India is an important trade partner for the EU and a growing worldwide, power. It combines a sizable and growing market of more than 1 billion people with a growth rate of between 8 and 10 % - one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Although it is far from the closed market that it was twenty years ago, India still also maintains substantial tariff and non-tariff barriers that hinder trade with the EU. The EU and India hope to increase their trade in both goods and services and investment through the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) discussions that they launched in 2007. Negotiations are expected to be concluded in early 2012.

In particular since the early 1990s, India has embarked on a process of economic reform and progressive integration with the global economy that aims to put it on a path of rapid and sustained growth. Per capita incomes more than doubled during the period 1990-2005. In parallel, EU-India trade has grown impressively and more than doubled from €28.6billion in 2003 to over €67.9 billion in 2010. EU investment to India has more than tripled since 2003 from €759million to €3 billion in 2010 and trade in commercial services has tripled from €5.2billion in 2002 to €17.9 billion in 2010. However, India's trade regime and regulatory environment still remain comparatively restrictive and in 2009 the World Bank downgraded the Indian rankto165 from 120 in 2008 (out of 183 economies) in terms of the 'ease of doing business'. In addition to tariff barriers to imports, India also imposes a number of non-tariff barriers in the form of quantitative restrictions, import licensing, mandatory testing and certification for a large number of products, as well as complicated and lengthy customs procedures.

In 2004 India became one of the EU's "strategic partners". Since 2005, the EU-India Joint Action Plan, revised in 2008, aims at realising the full potential of this partnership in key areas of interest to India and the EU.

The EU and India have in place an institutional framework, cascading down from the annual EU-India Summit, to a senior-official level Joint Committee, to the Sub-Commission on Trade and to working groups on technical issues such as technical barriers to trade (TBT), sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS), agricultural policy or industrial policy. These are the fora where a number of day-to-day issues, such as EU market access problems, are discussed 

o assist India in continuing its efforts to better integrate into the world economy with a view to further enhancing bilateral trade and investment ties, the EU is providing trade related technical assistance to India. €13.4million were allocated through the Trade and Investment Development Programme (TIDP) funded from the Country Strategy Paper (CSP) 2002-2006. At present, the follow-up programme to the TIDP is being designed and will be funded by the Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013.  

A successful conclusion of the Doha round would contribute significantly to a more open and stable environment for trade and investment for both the EU and India. India is also a major player in the DDA negotiations and, as a leader of the group of (advanced) developing countries known as the G20, has been one of the "G4", along with the EU, US and Brazil.

A free trade agreement with India offers great promise for New Zealand businesses. India is already one of our fastest growing markets, with New Zealand exports having tripled over the last decade” said Mr Groser.

New Zealand's exports to India were valued at NZ$630 million in 2009, a 280% increase on our 2001 exports to India and overall bilateral trade between India and New Zealand grew 180% between 2001 and 2009, from NZ$353 million to NZ$985 million. 

he British East India Company was an English and later (from 1707) British joint-stock companyformed for pursuing trade with the East Indies but which ended up trading mainly with the Indian subcontinent.

The East India Company traded mainly in cotton, silk, indigo dye, salt, saltpetre, tea and opium. The Company was granted a Royal Charter in 1600, making it the oldest among several similarly formed European East India Companies. Shares of the company were owned by wealthy merchants and aristocrats. The government owned no shares and had only indirect control. The Company eventually came to rule large areas of India with its own private army, exercising military power and assuming administrative functions. Company rule in India effectively began in 1757 after the Battle of Plassey and lasted until 1858 when, following the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Government of India Act 1858 led to the British Crown assuming direct control of India in the new British Raj.

India trade

The Company was dissolved in 1874 as a result of the East India Stock Dividend Redemption Act passed one year earlier, as the Government of India Act had by then rendered it vestigal, powerless and obsolete. Its functions had been fully absorbed into official government machinery in the British Raj and its private army had been nationalized by the British Crown. In the modern era, its history is strongly associated with corporate abuse, colonialism, exploitation, and monopoly power.

his time they succeeded, and on 31 December 1600, the Queen granted a Royal Charter to "George, Earl of Cumberland, and 215 Knights, Aldermen, and Burgesses" under the name, Governor and Company of Merchants of London trading with the East Indies. For a period of fifteen years the charter awarded the newly formed company a monopoly on trade with all countries east of the Cape of Good Hope and west of the Straits of Magellan. Sir James Lancaster commanded the first East India Company voyage in 1601.

Initially, the Company struggled in the spice trade due to the competition from the already well established Dutch East India Company. The Company opened a factory in Bantam on the first voyage and imports of pepper from Java were an important part of the Company's trade for twenty years. The factory in Bantam was closed in 1683. During this time ships belonging to the company arriving in India docked at Surat, which was established as a trade transit point in 1608.

In the next two years, the Company built its first factory in south India in the town of Machilipatnam on the Coromandel Coast of the Bay of Bengal. The high profits reported by the Company after landing in India initially prompted King James I to grant subsidiary licenses to other trading companies in England. But in 1609 he renewed the charter given to the Company for an indefinite period, including a clause which specified that the charter would cease to be in force if the trade turned unprofitable for three consecutive years.

The Company was led by one Governor and 24 directors, who made up the Court of Directors. They, in turn, reported to the Court of Proprietors which appointed them. Ten committees reported to the Court of Directors.

India trade